You are only seeing posts authors requested be public.
Register and Login to participate in discussions with colleagues.
Canadian News
Leafs turn attention to Sens in Battle of Ontario
London Knights advance to the OHL Western Conference Championship with overtime victory in Game 4
John Ivison: A debate Liberals can call a success, but not much else
What would you do if you were stuck in one place and every day was exactly the same and nothing you did mattered?
That was the question Phil Connors asked in the movie Groundhog Day, but it could equally have been put to the federal leaders who took part in debates over the past two nights. Everything was exactly the same and nothing much mattered.
The only spark of life in Thursday’s English-language debate came in the last half-hour when leaders were allowed to put their own question to another leader of their choice.
Mark Carney, the Liberal leader, was much more comfortable in his first language than in yesterday’s French, but was visibly rattled when Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative leader, accused him of being an adviser to Justin Trudeau during the “worst stagflation in a generation.”
The challenge to his fiscal competence hit close to home and Carney said that when he was responsible for inflation as a central banker in Canada, inflation was less than two per cent and the dollar was a parity. “That’s the kind of success I can deliver for Canadians,” he said.
Carney also took a hit from the NDP’s Jagmeet Singh, who accused Brookfield Asset Management, the company where Carney was recently chairman, of being “one of the biggest tax dodgers” and of hiking rents for millions of Canadians.
Carney spoke about Brookfield for perhaps the first time, saying it is a great Canadian success story that contributes to pension returns. “I always acted with integrity. I served the shareholders of Brookfield, but I have left that and am now working for the people of Canada,” he said.
That break with the traditional format was a success and forced the leaders to shift off their talking points.
But for the most part, the leaders were stuck in the same stalemate that held sway the previous night .
Pulses did not quicken to hear all leaders talk about the need to confront Donald Trump from “a position of strength.”
The arguments and many of the lines were repeated from the previous night — and rarely bore repeating.
Carney promised to double the rate of house building.
Poilievre said the only thing that doubled on Justin Trudeau’s watch was prices, even though the former Liberal prime minister had also said he would double house building.
Carney said Poilievre had spent his time railing against Trudeau and the carbon tax “and they’re both gone.”
If you can pick a winner out of that, you’re probably a partisan.
Poilievre has taken small bites out of Carney’s polling lead over the past week and the most likely explanation was the Conservatives’ focus on crime . The one time that he gathered momentum was in a discussion over his willingness to use the notwithstanding clause to impose consecutive life sentences on multiple murderers.
In Thursday’s debate, Carney suggested using the clause was a slippery slope. “It’s not about where you start but where you stop,” he said.
Poilievre’s response was visceral. “You don’t appreciate the chaos unfolding on our streets. People are living in terror because of the catch and release law (Liberal bill C-75),” he said.
It is always hard to know what will be clipped and shared but if I was a Conservative, I’d be clipping that one.
Despite his attacks on Carney, Singh spent almost as much time going after Poilievre, as if he’d been deputized by the Liberals. He said the Conservatives plan to save people $2,000 in tax cuts but will cost them tens of thousands of dollars by cutting child care, dental care and pharmacare (although Poilievre has not said he will cut any of those things).
Yves-François Blanchet, the Bloc Québécois leader, occasionally chimed in from the sidelines with a caustic comment that was generally aimed at Carney. “You are a real Canadian leader,” he said at one point, “saying one thing in French and another in English,” in reference to Carney’s different statements on pipelines.
But Blanchet doesn’t want Carney’s job — just a role for the Bloc in a minority. “You can’t be entitled to hold all the power in two hands without being checked by serious people,” he said. “I don’t want to be prime minister, but Quebec wants to be a responsible and collaborative partner.” That tells you all you need to know about the appetite for sovereignty in the province right now.
As far as the impact on the broader election race, the debate was a nothingburger: there simply were no flashpoints that would justify anyone shifting their vote.
For the Liberals, that is mission accomplished.
National Post
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here .
Party leaders didn't take media questions after the English debate. Here's why
OTTAWA — In a surprise move, the Leaders’ Debates Commission abruptly cancelled the media availabilities that were set to happen with each leader after the English-language debate.
The decision was officially announced after the debate by the commission’s executive director, Michel Cormier, after an earlier verbal altercation between employees of some right-wing media outlets and some journalists who were present to cover Thursday evening’s English-language face-off in Montreal.
“I’m sorry to announce that there will be no scrum tonight with the leaders, because we don’t feel that we can actually guarantee a proper environment for this activity,” said Cormier, who repeated the statement in French. The head of the taxpayer-funded organization did not take any questions.
The announcement came amid rising tension between various journalists and right-wing outlet members, particularly Rebel News.
The sudden decision was the third such last-minute changes announced by the commission in 48 hours. On the eve of Wednesday’s French debate, the commission suddenly decided to start it two hours earlier because the 8 p.m. start time conflicted with a key Montreal Canadiens game. On the morning of the face-off, it decided to boot Green Party co-leader Jonathan Pedneault for failing to have the requisite number of candidates to be eligible.
Part of the commission’s mandate is to “make debates a more predictable, reliable, and stable element of federal election campaigns.” It was set up by the Trudeau Liberals in 2018, eliminating individual leaders’ election debates that had been traditionally hosted by media outlets.
Commission head Michel Cormier spent most of Thursday explaining how Rebel News was granted more questions than most mainstream outlets during the media availabilities after Wednesday evening’s French-language debate .
The Leaders’ Debates Commission agreed to bypass its general rule of granting only one media pass per organization after Rebel News threatened to sue the commission.
Rebel News and other right-wing outlets peppered questions at Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh after Wednesday’s debate.
Singh in particular got four questions from Rebel News, which he refused to answer, as has been his usual practice for years with Rebel News, during his brief media availability on Wednesday.
On Thursday afternoon, Cormier told CBC that he was unaware that Rebel News founder Ezra Levant also runs a third-party campaign advertiser registered with Elections Canada.
After a tense discussion broke out between Levant and journalists who were covering the event, National Post saw Cormier and others pull Levant into a hallway adjacent to the media room, where they spoke for about 10 minutes.
Despite the cancellation of the post-debate scrums organized by the commission, Singh held his own press conference in a hotel in Montreal after Thursday’s event concluded.
Earlier in the day, Carney said he still believes Leaders’ Debates Commission should be handling the debates.
“I think there’s value in having an independent body that sets the rules for the debate and prosecutes them. I think some of the decisions, I’m sure, will be called into question but I don’t think it’s for the political leaders to be making those determinations,” he said.
With files from Christopher Nardi.
National Post
calevesque@postmedia.com
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.
Senators score comeback win over Hurricanes, but finish without Brady Tkachuk
‘Trudeau is not here’: Federal leaders try to put the past behind them
Meet the 100-year-old B.C. jazz pianist who played with the greats
‘Stay in your own lane’: Critics irked with Alberta transportation ask to kill bike network plan
Leafs down Wings in regular-season finale
Study by conservation group finds elevated pathogen levels near B.C. fish farms
Who won the English-language leaders' debate?
‘Tired trope’ of western separation ‘needs to stop,’ B.C. premier says
B.C. scraps search for U.S.-made Yeti water bottles after buy-Canadian questions
Turbulence at Vancouver airport over as air traffic control returns to full staffing
Air Canada flight to Toronto diverted to Des Moines after smoke smell detected
After the smell of smoke was detected, an Air Canada flight from Las Vegas to Toronto was diverted to Des Moines International Airport on Thursday.
Air Canada Rouge Flight 1702 landed in Iowa as a precautionary measure after an acrid odour was noticed in the flight deck, Air Canada stated in an email.
No injuries were reported among the 176 passengers on board. The aircraft landed normally following standard procedure, and was met by airport first responders and was cleared to taxi to the gate, the airline said.
A replacement aircraft was dispatched, allowing passengers to arrive at Toronto early this morning, the spokesperson noted.
This incident echoes a similar emergency landing from Air Canada Jazz Flight 7962. The regional aircraft heading from Toronto to Montreal had to land on CBF Trenton on July 31, 2024, according to InQuinte .
That flight was diverted after pilots smelled smoke in the flight deck. A Jazz Aviation spokesperson told InQuite that no fires were found and that the aircraft was inspected after its safe arrival.
No one was harmed in the earlier incident but passengers reported they could smell the smoke as well. The source of the smell was unknown, InQuinte wrote.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.